Just a Thought – 07.10.25

Humility

The famous Kenosis passage (Philippians 2:1-11) calls us to humility.  Paul, before he extols the virtue of Christ’s emptying of Himself, says to believers, Do nothing from selfishness or empty conceit, but with humility of mind regard one another as more important than yourselves; do not merely look out for your own personal interests, but also for the interests of others” (vs 3-4)

Am I so interested in my own welfare (or spirituality or success or even my humility) that I act, live, as if my interests supersede everybody else’s?  I may be vertically super-humble, but am I humble horizontally?  I like what Lewis said, in Mere Christianity:

Do not imagine that if you meet a really humble man he will be what most people call ‘humble’ nowadays: he will not be a sort of greasy, smarmy person, who is always telling you that, of course, he is nobody. Probably all you will think about him is that he seemed a cheerful, intelligent chap who took a real interest in what you said to him. If you do dislike him it will be because you feel a little envious of anyone who seems to enjoy life so easily. He will not be thinking about humility: he will not be thinking about himself at all.

If anyone would like to acquire humility, I can, I think, tell him the first step. The first step is to realise that one is proud. And a biggish step, too. At least, nothing whatever can be done before it. If you think you are not conceited, it means you are very conceited indeed.

What would our homes, our church, or our nation look like if everyone regarded his brothers and sisters as more important than he is?

Trying to keep it real,

Pastor Scott

Happy 249th Birthday!

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

New Hampshire:

Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

Massachusetts:

John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island:

Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

Connecticut:

Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York:

William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey:

Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

Pennsylvania:

Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

Delaware:

Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

Maryland:

Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia:

George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina:

William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina:

Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

Georgia:

Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton

On July 2, 1776, Congress voted to dissolved the connection between “this country” and Great Britain, declaring the “United Colonies of North America” to be free and independent states. Congress ratified the text of the Declaration on July 4, and it reached the King of England six months later.

Image courtesy of the National Archives.

“The Work of His Hands” – June 26, 2025

“The heavens are telling of the glory of God;

And their expanse is declaring the work of His hands.” ~Psalm 19:1

Kelly and I had the life-time privilege of cruising the inside straight of Alaska to celebrate our multi-decade wedding anniversary earlier this month..  It was amazing, but we came home to hear of crises after crises on the world stage.  So many events, some fairly nuanced and some as blunt as a bowling pin.  I was feeling pressed to opine about at least one of said happenings, but I kept coming back to our trip.  Not just the fun and relaxation we had, but the views!  Water, ice, mountain upon  mountain.  Bald eagles flying over us and seals cavorting on the waters below.  Yes, there are problems and issues among human kind.  Yes, we have a responsibility  to love our neighbors as ourselves and share the gospel as often as we are able.  But…the works of His hands shout even louder louder than the news!

I am All-Powerful

I am All-Wise

I love you

And the future is ENTIRELY in My Hands.

Quiet yourself, child, and trust Me!

PS

Persecution – May 29, 2025

I received an article today that detailed how disenfranchised Christianity is becoming (I’ve attached it below). My overwhelming thought was, “Yes, and we were told exactly what to do!”

Read 1 Peter 4 – read the whole chapter, read it aloud, pause and meditate on it. That’s my advice to the author, and to all of us who are provoked by the news of the world.

Praying for you all!

Pastor Scott

Safe am I – May 22, 2025

As Graduation announcements fill my inbox, I’m reminded that I graduated from College 40 years ago.  Which means, among other things, that I probably have more years in the rear view mirror than I do in the windshield.  Like many of you, I’ve seen wars and rumors of wars. I’ve suffered heartache and been presented with a few speed bumps that looked like mountains, but in all that time God’s faithfulness was evident and the words of this childhood song remained true, as they will until He takes me home!

Be blessed!

Safe am I, safe am I,

In the hollow of His hands,

Sheltered o’er, sheltered o’er

With His love for evermore

No ill can harm me,

No foe alarm me,

For He keeps both day and night.

Safe am I, safe am I,

In the hollow of his hands.*

Yours, because I’m His,

Pastor Scott

*Mildred Dillon was my Dad’s aunt – she wrote hundreds of hymns for the Sunshine Gospel Mission in Chicago; this is the only one that made it into the hymnals.

Bowels of Mercy – May 15, 2025

I find writing on a given subject goes rather smoothly, but am sometimes challenged to come up with a subject.  This morning a grandson’s conversation had the term “bowels of mercies” running through my head.  The phrase appears 11 times in the KJV, but most notably (at least to me) in Colossians 3:12:  

Put on therefore, as the elect of God, holy and beloved, bowels of mercies, kindness,       humbleness of mind, meekness, long-suffering;…

I love the following illustration, especially, in light of the acrimoniousness of today’s political and theological discourse!  I think it stands in place of anything I could write on the matter. ~Pastor Scott


A true Christian is like the lily which stings no one, and yet he lives among those who are full of sharpness. He aims to please, and not to provoke, and yet he lives among those whose existence is a standing menace. The thorn tears and lacerates: it is all armed from its root to its topmost branch, defying all comers. But there stands the lily, smiling, not defying; charming, and not harming. Such is the real Christian, holy, harmless, full of love and gentleness and tenderness. Therein lieth his excellence. Who would not stop and turn aside to see a lily among thorns, and think he reads a promise from his God to comfort him amid distress? Such is a true Christian: he is a consolation in his family, a comfort in his neighbourhood, an ornament to his profession, and a benediction to his age. He is all tenderness and gentleness, and yet it may be he lives among the envious, the malicious, and the profane, a lily among thorns. The thorn saith, “Keep away; no one shall touch me with impunity.” The lily cries, “I come to you, I shed my soul abroad to please you.”  

“So, as those who have been chosen of God, holy and beloved, put on a heart of compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience; please you.” (Col 3:12 NASB1995)

And speaking of “bowels* of mercy”, this a good article:

https://telosblog.com/the-sacred-spleen-of-jesus/

*Paul technically used the Greek word for “spleen”.

New Question, Old Answer – May 8, 2025

Back in the day the publisher of the monthly newsletter would submit questions for me to answer in my column.  This question from 2010 popped up this last week in class.  So I offer this exchange between a “nit-picker” and me.

Dear Pastor Scott,

Why are we a congregational church rather than an elder-led church?  My sister says there’s no scriptural support for that model.  What gives???

Too Nit-Picky?

 Dear Nit-Picker,

That’s sort of like asking, “Pastor Scott how can you say you’re Swedish when we can all see you are a Caucasian?”   We are legally or technically a congregational church and we are actually an elder-led church.  Let me see if I can explain.

There are three generally (legally?) recognized forms of church polity.  They are (according to Theopikea):

EpiscopalChurches having Episcopal polity are governed by bishops. The title bishop comes from the Greek word episkopos, which literally translates into overseer. In regard to Catholicism, bishops have authority over the diocese, which is both sacramental and political; as well as performing ordinations, confirmations, and consecrations, the bishop supervises the clergy of the diocese and represents the diocese both secularly and in the hierarchy of church governance.  Bishops in this system may be subject to higher ranking bishops (variously called archbishops, metropolitans, and/or patriarchs, depending upon the tradition; They also meet in councils or synods. These synods, subject to presidency by higher ranking bishops, may govern the dioceses which are represented in the council, though the synod may also be purely advisory.

Presbyterian meaning “Elder-led.” Many Reformed churches, notably those in the Presbyterian and Continental Reformed traditions, are governed by a hierarchy of councils. The lowest level council governs a single local church and is called the session or consistory; its members are called elders. The minister of the church (sometimes referred to as a teaching elder) is a member of and presides over the session; lay representatives (ruling elders or, informally, just elders) are elected by the congregation. The session sends representatives to the next level higher council, called the presbytery or classis. In some Presbyterian churches there are higher level councils (synods and/or general assemblies). Each council has authority over its constituents, and the representatives at each level are expected to use their own judgment. Hence higher level councils act as courts of appeal for church trials and disputes, and it is not uncommon to see rulings and decisions overturned.

Congregational Congregationalist polity dispenses with titled positions such as bishop as a requirement of church structure. The local congregation rules itself, though local leaders and councils may be appointed.  Members may be sent from the congregation to associations that are sometimes identified with the church bodies formed by Lutherans, Presbyterians, Anglicans, and other non-congregational Protestants. The similarity is deceptive, however, because the congregationalist associations do not exercise control over their members (other than ending their membership in the association). Many congregationalist churches are completely independent in principle. One major exception is Ordination, where even congregationalist churches often invite members of the vicinage or association to ordain their called pastor.  It is a principle of congregationalism that ministers do not govern congregations by themselves. They may preside over the congregation, but it is the congregation which exerts its authority in the end.  Congregational polity is sometimes called “Baptist polity”, as it is the characteristic polity of Baptist churches.

I wasn’t even born when Blue Ridge (Now DBA Word of Grace) was incorporated, but as I understand it we (they) had three choices.  We (they) strongly believed that our church should be self-governed and, therefore we are, by definition, a congregational church.  And I would bet my left lung, if I were a betting man, that your sister’s church is “congregational” too, at least according to the definitions above.

By now I trust the reader is wondering how it is that I can say we are a Congregational/Elder-led church.  Let’s start by looking at some definitions in Scripture:

In Acts 6 we have the story of the Apostles (who were serving as the Elders/Overseers of the one and only church at that time) being bombarded by service requests.  Their response was to tell the congregation to go choose seven men, filled with the Holy Spirit, to serve the Apostles as deacons (ministers, servants).  In one passage you have the establishment of congregational polity and the office of deacon.

Later, as the church grew, elders were established.  We first see it in Acts 14:23 – “When they had appointed elders for them in every church, having prayed with fasting, they commended them to the Lord in whom they had believed.”   The word isn’t really explained since there were always elders in Israel.  But it’s interesting to note that the word “elder” is plural and the word “church” is singular.  Notice James 5:14 – “Is anyone among you sick? Then he must call for the elders of the church and they are to pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord;”  or 1 Peter 5:1 “Therefore, I exhort the elders among you, as your fellow elder and witness of the sufferings of Christ, and a partaker also of the glory that is to be revealed,”  It seems pretty clear to me that every church has a plurality of elders, but what about the bishops?  Are they in Scripture as well?

As mentioned in the article above, the Greek word is Episkopos and it is translated “Overseer” and transliterated as “Bishop.”  It is only used in the Pastoral Epistles.  We see it in 1 Timothy 3:1-2 – “It is a trustworthy statement: if any man aspires to the office of overseer, it is a fine work he desires to do.  An overseer, then, must be above reproach,….”  The office of overseer seems to come from out of the blue here, except that in chapter five he starts talking about “Elders who rule well” which gives us a hint that he might be using the word Elder and Bishop interchangeably.  This hint is confirmed in Titus when he gives Titus the same instruction:  “For this reason I left you in Crete, that you would set in order what remains and appoint elders in every city as I directed you, namely, if any man is above reproach, the husband of one wife, having children who believe, not accused of dissipation or rebellion.  For the overseer must be above reproach as God’s steward, not self-willed, not quick-tempered, not addicted to wine, not pugnacious, not fond of sordid gain,”   Elders are Overseers (Bishops) and Overseers are Elders.  At least in the Bible, but not in “the church.”

The Church that became the RC saw Paul referring to the office, singular, of Overseer – Bishop they also saw (or some would argue, inherited) a system whereby individual men already had a lot of power.  For all that they claim Peter was the first pope, it was James (Acts 15) that headed the council at Jerusalem, to whom Paul, the overseer of all gentile churches, reported.  In the same way Paul then seems to oversee Timothy and Titus, heads of the churches in Ephesus and in Crete.   I truly see a plurality of Elders, but it’s not hard to see how the Bishoprics got started.

That brings us to the reformation.  Calvin and Knox agree with me about the plurality of Elders but they still thought in terms of church hierarchy.  So you have councils of Elders reporting to Councils of Elders (Presbyterianism).  Still others in the reform movement determined to place the authority in the local church movement and thus Congregationalism was formed.

We are a Bible Church.  Our movement was born just 100 years ago when many of the mainline denominations started to slip away from Fundamental Doctrines of the Faith.  Many of our parent denominations were Hierarchical in nature and we wanted nothing to do with that so we (along with most evangelical/fundamental churches) chose to keep our churches autonomous and therefore congregational.  We believe in a plurality of Elders and our bylaws do affirm that the Elders oversee EVERYTHING.  However, in keeping with the fact that the church (the body) is autonomous  the congregation still votes on (ratifies) things like the hiring of a new senior pastor, the annual budget and our deacons and our elders.  It’s really a model of the republic and some have called our model the federated model.

And that’s probably waaay more than you wanted to know.

In Christ,

Pastor Scott

Psalm 138:6 – May 1, 2025

Given a choice between being an eagle and being a sparrow I would much rather be an eagle!  Soaring over the mountain ranges rather than hovering around someone’s chimney.  Of course, that’s a gut reaction not a wise response.  The truth is an eagle neither needs nor asks for help.  In my flesh that’s who/what I want to be.  Then I remember that even if I was an Olympic Power Lifter or a ranking member of Mensa and felt totally capable of dealing with anything that comes my way;  “He gives us more grace. This is why it says: ‘God opposes the proud, but gives grace to the humble.’” James 4:6

So go ahead and embrace “sparrowhood”   – His eye, after all, isn’t on the eagle!  

~ Just a thought, Pastor Scott

Why should I feel discouraged?
Why should the shadows come?
Why should my heart be lonely
And long for heav’n and home,
When Jesus is my portion?
My constant Friend is He:
His eye is on the sparrow,
And I know He watches me;
His eye is on the sparrow,
And I know He watches me.I sing because I’m happy—
I sing because I’m free—
For His eye is on the sparrow,
And I know He watches me.


“Let not your heart be troubled.”
His tender word I hear,
And resting on His goodness,
I lose my doubt and fear.
Though by the path He leadeth,
But one step I may see:
His eye is on the sparrow,
And I know He watches me;
His eye is on the sparrow,
And I know He watches me.
I sing because I’m happy—
I sing because I’m free—
For His eye is on the sparrow,
And I know He watches me.

Whenever I am tempted,
Whenever clouds arise,
When songs give place to sighing,
When hope within me dies,
I draw the closer to Him;
From care He sets me free:
His eye is on the sparrow,
And I know He watches me;
His eye is on the sparrow,
And I know He watches me.
I sing because I’m happy—
I sing because I’m free—
For His eye is on the sparrow,
And I know He watches me.

Living it out! Apr 24, 2025

I can’t always keep other people or businesses or drivers or politicians from causing me harm, but if I would live by grace – saying yes to Him and “no” to ungodliness and worldly passions, at least the harm I do experience won’t be self-inflicted!  

Just a thought,

Pastor Scott 

Living Hope – April 14, 2025

Beloved,

The promise of Easter is that no matter how horrible your life, your circumstances, or even your family is now, it will get, infinitely, better!  Or as the song says, “everything will be alright!” 

“Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His great mercy has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,  to obtain an inheritance which is imperishable and undefiled and will not fade away, reserved in heaven for you, who are protected by the power of God through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.”  (1 Peter 1:3-5)

And because He lives….

Crowder, Johnnyswim, Tori Kelly – Because He Lives (Easter At Passion City Church)

Pastor Scott