Loose Ends – June 14, 2024

#1 of 2

“No one who is born of God practices sin, because His seed abides in him; and he cannot sin, because he is born of God” ~ 1 John 3:9

Several weeks (more likely months ago) I answered a question here about the verse above by posting the amplified translation which aligned the first half (practices) with the second half of the verse that declares an absolute.  A congregant pointed out a better resolution offered by the Bible Teacher Zane Hodges.  In his commentary on 1 John, Dr. Hodges reminds us of Christ’s imputed righteousness, which means by definition we stand before God without sin; our new nature is without sin.  Of course this new Holy Nature, should be affecting our flesh; or “walk” as it’s often called in Scripture, and therein lies the rub.  

Our flesh is so very used to living in this world that putting it off and putting righteousness on is, for many of us, a major ordeal and/or a daily struggle.  The temptations of the world aren’t something we deal with on an occasional basis, but are a constant assault on our senses.  So while I’m aware of the principle that Hodges teaches, I’m fearful of anything that would cause any of us to ignore the important teaching of Colossians 3, or Ephesians 4-6, or Galatians 5, by causing us to think that we can’t sin anymore. I’ve watched that happen and it inevitably leads to more sin.  So yes, it’s a good but VERY NUANCED resolution to the 1 Peter 3:9! 🙂 

#2 of 2

Recently I was discussing the Roman Catholic origin of some communion practices in the Bible Study Hour class I teach as we are working our way through 1 Corinthians.  As is my habit I was supporting my point with a relevant illustration which had me explaining the English word “repentance.”  As it happens our English word comes down to us  from the Latin poenitire “make sorry,” which comes from poena (penal; or punishment).  I went on to make the point that in the New Testament the word is Meta (change) + Noia (mind).  I was pointing out that only once in the NT sorrow and metanoia are linked (2 Cor 7:9-10), but most often it’s a call to change our orientation about who God is or about how to approach Him.  And in other literature of the time “metanoia” was used the same way we might say “he ‘changed his mind’ and didn’t go to the store that night.”  As you can imagine this led to a discussion that had nothing to do with communion and everything to do with how salvation was NOT dependent on how sorry we are for our sin.

During class I received a text asking: “So what about the Romans Road?”  Great question!  Paul spends most of the first three chapters of Romans making sure everyone understands that they are sinners who fall short of the glory of God.  He then makes the point that none of us can boast because we are not saved by our works but  we are saved by faith alone.  There is no mention in the text of Romans of “sorrow for sin.”  However, in the presentation instructions for the Romans road or the Wordless book, the script often says something like, “Now, ask them to pray and tell God how sorry they are about their sin.”  Having a “contrite heart” is Biblical.  David writes about it in Psalm 51 wherein he confesses his horrible sin.  Isaiah writes of those who have done evil and are now “lowly and contrite.”   Again, it’s not wrong, per se, to be sad that you lived a life of sin, but it’s not really part of a road in the Book of Romans.    

Pastor Scott

Leave a comment